|
|
Journal of Cosmology, 2009, Vol 2, pages 293-295. Cosmology, November 4, 2009 Desperately Seeking a Cosmic Catastrophe 12,900 B.P. Richard Gillespie Ph.D., School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; and Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia A catastrophic bolide impact at 12.9 ka has been proposed by Firestone and colleagues to explain Younger Dryas cooling and megafauna extinction in North America. Radiocarbon dating of carbon spherules supposedly formed during this ET event do not support the hypothesis.
Several recent conference abstracts and published papers speculate that an extraterrestrial impact
12,900 years ago (12.9 ka) caused the Younger Dryas cold snap, decimating the Clovis culture
and sending the Rancholabrean megafauna in North America extinct (eg. Firestone, et al. 2007;
Kennett, et al. 2008; Firestone 2009). This could be judged as another catastrophic ET impact
hypothesis in the tradition of Alvarez, et al. (1980) and Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (2001), or as
another climate change hypothesis for Late Pleistocene megafauna extinction, in the tradition of
Leakey (1966) and Guthrie (2006).
In counterpoint to these and other hypotheses that catastrophic impacts and consequent rapid
climate change in geologically recent times caused megafauna extinctions and the decimation of
established human cultures, Martin (1973) suggests that "Unless one insists on believing that
Paleolithic invaders lost enthusiasm for the hunt and rapidly became vegetarians by choice as they
moved south from Beringia, or that they knew and practiced a sophisticated, sustained yield
harvest of their prey, one would have no difficulty in predicting the swift extermination of the
more conspicuous native American large mammals." Such a ‘blitzkrieg' of megafauna extinction
by newly arriving modern humans appears to have taken place ~13 ka in North America, ~45 ka
in Australia, and ~1280 AD in New Zealand (e.g. Haynes, 2008; Roberts et al., 2001; Grün, et al.,
2006; Wilmshurst et al., 2008), which was certainly catastrophic for the now-extinct megafauna in
those locations.
Both the ET impact/climate change and anthropogenic/blitzkrieg extinction hypotheses seem
distinctly unpalatable for different subgroups of commentators. My views on these matters can be
seen to support Martin's ‘blitkrieg' model in reviews of megafauna extinction (Gillespie, Brook
and Baynes, 2006; Gillespie, 2008) and in the popular science book The Bone Readers: Science
and Politics in Human Origins Research (Tuniz, Gillespie and Jones, 2009). I also support
numerical modelling (eg. Brook and Bowman, 2005; Brook and Johnson, 2006) which
demonstrates that human predation in formerly human-free lands inevitably leads rapidly to large-body-
mass-biased faunal extinction.
Garnering sufficient, and sufficiently compelling, evidence for any of these hypotheses has
always been a challenge. In an entertaining saga, Baillie (2003, 2007) follows a convoluted path
with many diversions, from frost-damaged treerings through volcanic dust veils, ancient legends,
comets and ice cores, to ET events in AD 539, 1014 and 1491. Differently-flavoured sorties in the
anthropogenic/climate change extinctions battle have been keenly observed by Fiedel and Haynes
(2004) and Haynes (2007).
My focus here is on Firestone (2009) and will be mainly about radiocarbon dating, starting with
his Table 3 list of calibrated 14C ages for carbon spherules, glassy carbon, charcoal and woody
debris recovered from sediments at the Clovis-age archaeological sites Gainey and Chobot, and
from sediments at several of the Carolina Bays. These include the first direct dates on material
(carbon spherules and glassy carbon) postulated to result from an ET explosion event over North
America at 12.9 ka. Firestone's list contains negative ages as well as the usual positive numbers,
which may confuse some players. Reimer et al. (2004a) comment on the negative age output
given by some calibration programmes: "While this works mathematically, it is philosophically
objectionable, because the decay of 14C used to calculate the 14C age is unrelated to time of
formation of a post-bomb sample." Firestone claims that his negative 14C dates on carbon
spherules imply that they "are enriched by a factor of »5 in 14C", presumably because they are
supposed to be 12.9 ka cal BP from the ET explosion.
Alternatively, noting that Firestone's carbon spherules differ significantly from the saturating 14C
abundance in meteorites (eg. Jull, et al., 2000) and 13C/12C ratios are not given, we might
reasonably assume that Firestone's samples are derived from terrestrial biogenic sources, whether
there was an ET event or not. Carbon-rich spherules, glassy carbon and charcoal are all known
products of high-temperature combustion, including wildfires, and taking into account that
atmospheric radiocarbon abundance almost doubled in the 1960s (due by the detonation of
nuclear weapons, known as the ‘bomb effect'), the most parsimonious interpretation of the carbon
spherule 14C dates is that they were produced by wildfires within the last 100 years (four are postbomb,
one early 20th century). Firestone's 14C dates have impressively small uncertainties (± 15 or
20 years), which implies that small sample size was not a problem, and some of these 20th century
carbon spherules have found their way to a depth of 20 cm in the Paleoindian site at Gainey.
Similarly, post-bomb 14C results from the Carolina Bays suggest that 20th century terrestrial
biogenic material has penetrated to a depth of 163 cm at Myrtle Bay (woody debris) and 145 cm
at Blackville Bay (charcoal), and there is no sensible age/depth relationship for any of the sites.
All radiocarbon labs have numerous examples like this, and further work usually points the finger
at incorrect sampling or faulty decontamination chemistry, but the data provided in Firestone
(2009) is insufficient to judge if there problems like these exist. Given the large numbers of
spherules found by Firestone and colleagues at many well-dated Clovis-age archaeological sites,
it would be a valuable exercise to measure their carbon isotope abundances and determine if the
spherules were formed by the 12.9 ka impact or not. Modern AMS dating facilities can measure
very small samples, and it would be feasible to measure the 14C ages of individual high-carbon
spherules, similar to the way modern luminescence dating facilites measure single sand grains to
estimate age populations for sediments (eg. Roberts et al., 2000).
Figure 1 The IntCal04 radiocarbon calibration curve 0–26 ka plotted from data referenced in Reimer et al. (2004b), showing 1 std. dev. envelope of uncertainty.There is also a problem with Figure 9 in Firestone (2009), which misleadingly shows ony a small part of the IntCal04 radiocarbon calibration curve; the curve runs from 0-26 ka cal BP (shown here in Figure 1, plotted from data referenced in Reimer et al. 2004b) and has many wiggles. The peak in question does not imply that atmospheric 14C abundance doubled or tripled at 12.9 ka cal BP, as Firestone claims; the curve plots 14C measurements on natural samples of independently known age (eg. tree-rings, corals and sediments with annual to decadal resolution) relative to the oxalic acid modern standard, reflecting mainly geomagnetic field variation which affects the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere, as well as atmospheric abundance variations due to global carbon-cycle changes. Firestone et al. (2007) provide more analytical data from many sites in support of an ET event at 12.9 ka, but Firestone (2009) insists that his 14C dates on carbon-rich materials from Gainey, Chobot and the Carolina Bays must be wrong because they don't fit either the stratigraphy or his assumed association with the cosmic catastrophe. Baillie's historical comets are much too young to be relevant for the Younger Dryas, but what about the one proposed by Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (2001)? The problem here is that a comet was supposed to have landed in the ocean, creating a water-vapour greenhouse effect sufficiently strong to terminate the YD at 11.7 ka b2k, whereas Firestone's bolide exploded in the atmosphere, melting the Laurentide ice sheet to initiate the YD at 12.9 ka cal BP. Incidently, I find the 50-year difference between the cal BP (14C-based, AD 1950 is zero) and b2k (ice corebased, AD 2000 is zero) timescales to be a counterproductive nuisance, which needs to be resolved by the relevant organisations. After all, both are projections on the same calendar scale we all use in daily life, and 50 years could mean looking in the wrong stratigraphic layers for debris from these proposed bolides which either started or ended the YD cold snap. Reimer and Hughen (2008) illustrate the significant 14C dating problems around the start of the YD interval, which unfortunately falls just off the end of the absolutely-dated treering record running to 12,400 cal BP. Depending upon which calibration curve and computer programme you choose, the resulting calendar age could lead or lag an event precisely dated by other means. There are many dating problems with the ice cores too (eg. Southon, 2002), and I have strong reservations about some of the conclusions Firestone et al. (2007) and Firestone (2009) draw from the ice core analytical results. But it also seems remarkable that the carbon-rich materials found so abundantly at Clovis-age sites and the Carolina Bays have not been noticed in the Greenland records. A lot of ice has been melted for high-resolution analysis, and if North America was on fire spreading combustion products throughout the USA, the Channel Islands off California and across the Atlantic to Belgium (Firestone, et al., 2007; Kennett, et al., 2008), one might be forgiven for thinking that a black carbon signal should be strong in Greenland ice cores of appropriate age. On the other hand, archaeological sites are exactly where you expect to find carbon-rich materials, so the analysis of accurately dated terrestrial sediments from non-archaeological sites in the 12.9 ka age range might also be instructive. Laminated varve sequences in Europe offer sub-annual resolution across the Allerød to Younger Dryas transition (e.g. Brauer, et al., 2008), and no doubt similar sediments occur in North America. Of course it may turn out that Firestone and colleagues are right: there really was an ET event which kick-started the Younger Dryas cooling, decimated the Clovis culture and caused the Rancholabrean megafauna extinction. However, I support the archaeological and logical criticisms of the YD bolide hypothesis in Surovell, et al. (2009), Hamilton and Buchanan (2009) and Fiedel (2009), and the impeccable stratigraphic analysis of Clovis-age sites by Haynes (2008), all of which make the case look decidedly wobbly. My interpretation of results from the best test of the hypothesis so far, the 14C dates on carbon spherules in Firestone (2009), discredits it even further.
Brauer, A., Haug, G.H., Dulski, P., Sigman, D.M. and Negendank, J.F.W. (2008). An abrupt wind
shift in western Europe at the onset of the Younger Dryas cold period. Nature Geoscience 1: 520-
523.
Brook, B.W. and Bowman, D.M.J.S. (2005). One equation fits overkill: why allometry underpins
both prehistoric and modern body size-biased extinctions. Population Ecology 47: 137–141.
Brook, B.W. and Johnson, C.N. (2006). Selective hunting of juveniles as a cause of the
imperceptible overkill of the Australian Pleistocene megafauna. Alcheringa, Special Issue 1: 39–
48.
Baillie, M. (2003). Exodus to Arthur: Catastrophic Encounters with Comets. London: Batsford.
Baillie, M. (2007). The case for significant numbers of extraterrestrial impacts through the late
Holocene. Journal of Quaternary Science 22: 101-109.
Fiedel, S. (2009). What Caused the Megafaunal Extinctions? The Case Against Bolide Impact.
Journal of Cosmology 2: 286-289.
Fiedel, S. and Haynes, G. (2004). A premature burial: comments on Grayson and Meltzer's
‘‘Requiem for overkill''. Journal of Archaeological Science 31: 121–131.
Firestone R.B., West, A., Kennett J.P., Becker L., Bunch T.E., et al. (2007). Evidence for an
extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal extinctions and the
Younger Dryas cooling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 16016-16021.
Gillespie, R. (2008) Updating Martin's global extinction model. Quaternary Science Reviews 27:
2522-29.
Gillespie, R., Brook, B.W., Baynes, A., 2006. Short overlap of people and megafauna in
Pleistocene Australia. Alcheringa, Special Issue 1: 163–185.
Grün, R., Eggins, S., Wells, R.T., Rhodes, E., et al. (2006). A cautionary tale from down under:
dating the Black Creek Swamp megafauna site on Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Quaternary
Geochronology 1: 142–150.
Guthrie, R.D. (2006) New carbon dates link climatic change with human migration and
Pleistocene extinctions. Nature 441: 207-209.
Hamilton, M.J. and Buchanan, B. (2009) Objections to the Case for the Younger Dryas
Extraterrestrial Impact Event. Journal of Cosmology 2: 415-417.
Haynes Jr., C.V. (2008). Younger Dryas ‘‘black mats'' and the Rancholabrean termination in
North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 6520–6525.
Haynes, G. (2007). A review of some attacks on the overkill hypothesis, with special attention to
misrepresentations and doubletalk. Quaternary International 169-170: 84–94.
Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, C. (2000). Cometary impacts and ice-ages. Astrophysics and
Space Science 275: 367–376.
Jull, A.J., Lal, D., Burr, G.S., Bland, B.A., Bevan, A.W.R. and Beck, J.W. (2000). Radiocarbon
beyond this world. Radiocarbon 42: 157-172.
Kennett, D.J., Kennett, J.P., West, G.J., Erlandson, J.M. et al. (2008). Wildfire and abrupt
ecosystem disruption on California's Northern Channel Islands at the Ållerød–Younger Dryas
boundary (13.0–12.9 ka). Quaternary Science Reviews 27: 2530–2545.
Leakey, L.S.B. (1966). Africa and Pleistocene overkill? Nature 212: 1615-1616.
Martin, P.S. (1973). The discovery of America. Science 179: 969-974.
Reimer, P.J., Brown, T.A. and Reimer, R.W. (2004a). Discussion: reporting and calibration of
post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46: 1299-1304.
Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., et al. (2004b). INTCAL04 Terrestrial
radiocarbon calibration, 0-26 CAL kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46: 1029-1058.
Reimer, P.J. and Hughen, K.A. (2008). Treerings floating on ice cores. Nature Geoscience 1: 218-
219.
Roberts, R.G., Galbraith, R.F., Yoshida, H., Laslett, G.M., Olley, J.M. (2000)/ Distinguishing dose
populations in sediment mixtures: a test of single-grain optical dating procedures using mixtures
of laboratory-dosed quartz. Radiation Measurements 32, 459-465.
Roberts, R.G., Flannery, T.F., Ayliffe, L.K., Yoshida, H., et al. (2001). New ages for the last
Australian megafauna: continent-wide extinction about 46,000 years ago. Science 292: 1888–
1892.
Southon, J. (2002). A First Step to Reconciling the GRIP and GISP2 Ice-Core Chronologies, 0–
14,500 yr B.P. Quaternary Research 57: 32–37.
Surovell T.A., Holliday V.T., Gingerich J.A.M., Ketron C., et al. (2009). An independent
evaluation of the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 106:
18155-18158.
Tuniz, C., Gillespie, R., and Jones, C. (2009) The Bone Readers: Science and Politics in Human
Origins Research. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Wilmshurst, J.M., Anderson, A.J., Higham, T.F.G., Worthy, T.H. (2008) Dating the late
prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 7676–7680.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colonizing the Red Planet ISBN: 9780982955239 |
Sir Roger Penrose & Stuart Hameroff ISBN: 9780982955208 |
The Origins of LIfe ISBN: 9780982955215 |
Came From Other Planets ISBN: 9780974975597 |
Panspermia, Life ISBN: 9780982955222 |
Explaining the Origins of Life ISBN 9780982955291 |